• Palyvoda Volodymyr
Keywords: Hungarians, national minority, irredenta, Treaty of Trianon, Transcarpathia, Hungary.


The article is devoted to the history of Hungarian national minority’s appearance on the territory of Ukraine, the current situation of Ukrainian-Hungarian relations, taking into account the position of Hungary in protecting the rights of its compatriots abroad. The problem of Russia’s attempt to inspire ethnic separatism in Transcarpathia is also considered. The term "irredenta" is a more precise definition for the Hungarian national minority, than the name "Hungarian diaspora in Ukraine". Unlike the diaspora, whose members are scattered throughout different countries of the world, far from their historical homeland, members of the irredenta are usually compactly settled in the states bordering their historic homeland. Their concentration is particularly high in the border, adjacent territories. The appearance of Hungarian irredenta in Ukraine is directly linked to the Treaty of Trianon, which was concluded in June 1920, between the Allied Entente States of the First World War and Hungary. This act was practically a revenge for the Hungarians for following the example of the Russian Bolsheviks and the creation of the Hungarian Soviet Republic. The consequences of the Trianon Treaty are now perceived in Hungary as a major catastrophe in the history of the state. Mood images over the lost territories and their compatriots, who became citizens of neighbouring states not on his own accord, are spreading in Hungarian society. For almost a hundred years of existence, this situation has created an very complex combination of moral-psychological, ethno-cultural, socio-economic, and, therefore, socio-political problems. Therefore, it is not surprising that practically all Hungarian parties is actively using in its rhetoric the so-called "post-Trianon syndrome". Since 1990, all Hungarian governments have identified the protection of the rights of national minorities living abroad as one of the main priorities of foreign policy. In this context, Ukraine became that particular state on the basis of which Hungary began to implement a pilot project of such an attitude towards the Hungarian national minority, which would meet the highest European requirements.


1. Aleksiun, N., Beauvois, D., & Ducret, M.-E., et al. (2009). Istoria Tsentralno-Vostochnoi Yevropy. Ch. I [History of Central-Eastern Europe. P. 1]. (М. Yu. Nekrasov, Trans., et al.). St.-Peterburg [in Russian].

2. Shimov, Ya. (2002). Perekriostok. Tsentralnaia Yevropa na rubiezhe tysiacheletii [Crossroads Central Europe at the turn of the millennium]. Moscow [in Russian].

3. Yevropa pislia Pershoi svitovoi viiny (1919–1923) [Europe after World War I (1919–1923)]. Materialy do vyvchennia Vsesvintnoi istorii mizhvoiennogo periodu – Materials for the study of world history of the interwar period. (n.d.). Retrieved from ucasniki-vijni [in Ukrainian].

4. Tkach, D. Polityka ofitsiinoi Uhorshchyny shchodo natsionalnoi avtonomii u susidnikh krainakh: pravda ta domysly [The policy of official Hungary on national autonomy in the neighboring countries: the truth and speculation]. Vyklyky і ryzyky. Bezpekovyi ohliad TsDAKR – Challenges and risks. Security review of CSACD, 9 (72). (n.d.). cacds. Retrieved from ru/bulletin/1095 [in Ukrainian].

5. Shypka, N. (2007). Uhorska natsionalna menshyna yak chynnyk formuvannia ukrainsko-uhorskykh mizhderzhavnykh politychnykh vidnosyn (1991–2006 rr.) [Hungarian national minority as a factor in the formation of Ukrainian-Hungarian interstate political relations (1991–2006)]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», Is. 19 [in Ukrainian].

6. Tkach, D. (2004). Suchasna Uhorshchyna v konteksti suspilnykh transformatsii [Contemporary Hungary in the context of social transformations]. Kyiv: MAUP [in Ukrainian].

7. Vitse-premier Uhorshchyny: «Аvtonomiia – meta ta maibutnie zakordonnykh uhorskykh menshyn» [Vice Prime Minister of Hungary: «Autonomy – the purpose and the future of foreign Hungarian minorities»]. (n.d.). www. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

8. Posla Uhorshchyny vyklykaly do MZS Ukrainy cherez zaklyk uhorskoho vitse-premiera stvoriuvaty avtonomii v susidnikh krainakh [Ambassador of Hungary was summoned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine by reason of the Hungarian Vice Prime Minister’s call to create autonomy in neighboring countries]. (n.d.). ua. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

9. Zaiavy uhorskoho premiera osoblyvo nedorechni pid chas ahresii RF – MZS [The statements of the Hungarian Prime minister are especially inappropriate during the Russian aggression – MFA]. (n.d.). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

10. Konstytutsia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]. (1996). Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.к/96-вр [in Ukrainian].

11. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro hromadianstvo Ukrainy» vid 18 sichnia 2001 r. № 2235-III [Law of Ukraine «On citizenship of Ukraine» from 2002, 18 Jan. No. 2235-III]. (n.d.). Retrieved from ua/laws/show/2235-14 [in Ukrainian].

12. Driomov, S.V. (2017). Instytut hromadianstva yak rehuliator vplyvu na stan zabezpechennia natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [The Institute of citizenship as a regulator of the impact on the status of Ukraine’snational security]. Кyiv: NISS [in Ukrainian].

13. Deklaratsia pro pryntsypy spivrobitnytstva mizh Ukrainskoiu Radianskoiu Sotsialistychnoiu Respublikoiu ta Uhorskoiu Respublikoiu po zabezpechenniu prav natsionalnykh menshostei [Declaration on the Principles of Cooperation between the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Republic of Hungary for the Protection of the Rights of National Minorities]. (2001). Zbirnyk chynnykh mizhnarodnykh dohovoriv Ukrainy – Collection of current international treaties of Ukraine. Т. 1. Кyiv [in Ukrainian].

14. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro natsionalni menshyny v Ukraini» vid 25 chervnia 1992 r. № 2494-ХІІ [Law of Ukraine «On national minorities in Ukraine» from 2002, 25 June No. 2494-ХІІ]. Retrieved from http://–12 [in Ukrainian].

15. Rosia planuvala provokatsii iz sutychkamy ta protystoianniam na temi avtonomii na Zakarpatti, zatrymano proplachenoho «videooperatora» [Russia planned provocations with clashes and confrontation on the topic of autonomy in Transcarpathia, paid «video operator» was detained]. (n.d.). Retrieved from http:// [in Ukrainian].

16. Palyvoda, V. Aktyvizatsiia rosiiskoi rozvidky na yevropeiskomu kontynenti [Activization of Russian intelligence on the European continent]. Vyklyky і ryzyky. Bezpekovyi ohliad TsDAKR – Challenges and risks. Security review of CSACD, 8 (71). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

17. Pryvydy uhorskoho separatyzmu v Ukraini [Ghosts of Hungarian separatism in Ukraine]. (n.d.). Retrieved fromпривиди-угорського-сепаратизму-в-україні/a-38142356?maca=ukr-rss- ukrnet-ukr-all-3816-xml [in Ukrainian].

18. «Yobbik» znachit «Za luchshuiu Vengriiu!» [«Jobbik» means «For the best Hungary!»]. (n. d.). Retrieved from [in Russian].

19. Uhorshchyna vidkhrestylasia vid «sposterihacha», yakyi buv prysutnii na «vyborakh» u «DNR» 2 lystopada [Hungary disowned the «observer» who was present at the «elections» of the «DPR» on November 2]. (n.d.). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

20. Beila Kovach, zvynuvachenyi u shpygunstvi na koryst Rosii, potrapyv u likarniu [Bela Kovacs, who was accused of espionage in favor of Russia, got into a hospital]. (n.d.). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
How to Cite
Volodymyr, P. (2018). THE HUNGARIANS OF TRANSCARPATHIA: HISTORICAL ASPECT, TODAY AND PERSPECTIVES. Strategic Priorities, 46(1), 63-69. Retrieved from